A detailed design for a CRTMDS was developed and the tool fabricated. This design was based similar to design was tested for Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in September 2005 at the Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center near Casper, WY. The smaller, 2.625-inch tool averaged 82 feet/hour drilling 130 feet in 1.6 hours. Conventional 2.625-inch polycrystalline diamond compact bits average 10-30 feet/hour. CRTMDS bit assembly. The LANL test proved the design elements of higher ROP using low weight on bit (about 700 pounds) and low reactive torque.
Several tests were performed at GTI’s Catoosa test site. These tests showed that although high penetration rates were easily achieved, the tool twisted off between the two counter rotating cutter systems. Based on these observations, a new design was prepared. This motor develops significant torque in a short length and does not contain the typical failure prone rubber or urethane stator components. A single, left hand vane motor, left hand bit, and proper pin connections will be assembled as soon as possible to perform a test run at the GTI - Catoosa test facility. All bearings and major wear components within the new motor will be upgraded to PDC, yielding an order of magnitude greater wear resistance and reliability.
The tool was redesigned , fabricated and field tested in March 2009 at the Catoosa Test Site. Once again the tool encountered problems. It was determined that although shop testing with clean oil, nitrogen, and clean water showed promising rpms and torque, the motor is very susceptible to small particles. When the tool was disassembled after the field test, small particles and surface corrosion among the tight tolerance components were noted. After cleaning the corrosion, these assemblies seemed to operate properly. Also noted on the number 2 motor was some damage to an internal drive component, likely caused by drill pipe rotation while the motor was in a locked condition. Areas for improving the tool were noted during th field test and it is felt that the tool is very close to being successful. Therefore, Dennis Tool plans to continue the development of this tool.