Texas Engineering Experiment Station, GPRI-Department of Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Washington, DC
Results
Oil and suspended solids content were removed effectively with membrane treatment (content was measured using turbidity and oil in water measurements taken periodically). The test results showed that an ultrafiltration membrane provided turbidity removal of over 99% and oil removal of 78% for the produced-water samples. The results indicated that the ultrafiltration membranes would be effective as one of the first steps in purifying the water.
Membrane cleaning of produced water fouled membranes was then performed using test emulsion cleaning solutions. Physical cleaning factors on cleaning were studied for the emulsion solution along with the multiple membranes of the same polyvinyl diflouride material but different nominal separation characteristics or manufacturers.
In the first series of cleaning experiments, the differences between the micelle micro emulsion solutions were tested. Each test was conducted on the same membrane under the identical cleaning parameters of flow rates and time. Experiments were conducted using the best two micelle solutions from the first test series and performing three sets of flow experiments. In the first set, only flow rate of the cleaning solution was changed within the set. In the second set, flow rate and membrane were both changed. In the third set flow rate, cleaning formula, and membrane were changed with all other cleaning parameters kept the same as the first test series. Those experiments tested the effects of shear stress on cleaning solution effectiveness. This series of tests also considered whether the different formulas had different or corresponding effect on cleaning performance and flow rate effect and whether the different membranes showed similar performance trends.
The brine results show removal efficiency between 95.7% to 99.8% for all three membranes and under all experimental conditions. Oil removal ranged from 47.3% to 97.3% and is heavily influenced by TMP and flow rate. The cleaning experiments show that the chemical composition has the most influence on the effectiveness, with formulas 50406B, 50928A, and 50928C showing best results. They also indicate the increasing cleaning flow rate improved performance until the cleaning solution starting fouling the membrane. Increasing rinse flow rate had little effect and rinse flow time improved effectiveness slightly.
The brine results indicate that BN membrane performed best for removal efficiency and flux and the PTI membrane performed better at lower flow rates for a specific transmembrane pressure. The cleaning solution provides efficient cleaning, but controlling temperature above 20 °C will be necessary for most efficient operation. The data showed that the use of the new type of cleaning agent was a feasible alternative to traditional means of restoring flux in membrane systems. Specifically the data showed that a micelle solution to clean the produced water-fouled membranes was a feasible and effective method. The study shows that the micelle solution performed better than acidic and basic solutions reported in the literature for this type of foulant. The study also showed with further adjustment of the micelle solution the cleaning effectiveness could be optimized for an ambient temperature cleaning of membranes.
Benefits
Products developed through this type of research already have been successfully commercialized. Chevron Corp. products save North Slope operators more than $8,000,000 annually. Introduction of a new Texas A&M process to the commercial water treatment industry is expected to be just as readily accepted. Industry partners will assist in a licensing and commercialization program led by the Texas A&M Technology & Licensing Department. The potential licensee are CHB Chemical Specialties, LLP, and a Texas corporation planning to commercialize the product.